In every software development project, there will always be flaws. Even after initial and second release, bugs just become more difficult to track. Debugging then becomes a more difficult task if there is no proper flow in testing and there is no proper version control and documentation.
IBM is a widely known company that works with operating systems such us MS 2000 and Linux, among many of the other OS that use it. The I series compiles languages such as Pascal, c, assembly and more. IBM I series unit testing is basically used for I series apps. The testing method can vary depending on the developers working on the software.
This method is essentially writing a code to exercise each functional fragment of the whole software, or in this case a module or a class from what is being developed. So when the module is being written, the unit test is also written with it. It is vital to add the tests during version control. Firstly it serves as a form of documentation, second this allows other developers to run and test the local features for themselves.
With this type of test the bugs in the code are discovered even before the function is added into the repository and on to the clients and testers. As a type of TDD or Test Driven Development, developers constantly check for the bugs during the process of making the whole system. Even with the isolation of one fragment from another during the tests, the overall continuous database integrity is not compromised.
This prevents the faulty products to reach testers and clients since the programming team is alerted of them automatically. This makes the whole process to be less costly than passing something that might still have fatal bugs to consumers. And with checking only parts it make changing these fragments work without affecting the original behavior of the existing code as a whole.
The program is protected from time and space bound factors. When the tests are done, the code is guaranteed to work under all circumstances even after updates done later. Like mentioned earlier, the whole system is protected from the domino effect of bugs and errors when an edit is done or when a feature is added. This makes sure that while the testing is compartmentalized, its connection to other modules remain.
In software development, the more code is added to the repository, the more difficult it is to find the faulty piece of programming if something crashes. This is not the case with unit testing. This results to other developers being reluctant to add in the program already written in fear that if they added to the repository it might destroy everything.
There are cases when clients ask for quick fixes. With the fear of adding more modules, or removing them from the whole, it becomes easier for developers to deploy the fixes. There are no side effects that can cause the program to crash because the results are already tested without the need of predicting the logical errors that may occur.
There will always be a counter argument to disqualify this method. The strongest one being that this type of TDD is just too time consuming. But the point of this method is for future development and in circumstances that other modules might be added. The nature of unit testing also makes it readable for developers who might get deployed to the project in later stages.
IBM is a widely known company that works with operating systems such us MS 2000 and Linux, among many of the other OS that use it. The I series compiles languages such as Pascal, c, assembly and more. IBM I series unit testing is basically used for I series apps. The testing method can vary depending on the developers working on the software.
This method is essentially writing a code to exercise each functional fragment of the whole software, or in this case a module or a class from what is being developed. So when the module is being written, the unit test is also written with it. It is vital to add the tests during version control. Firstly it serves as a form of documentation, second this allows other developers to run and test the local features for themselves.
With this type of test the bugs in the code are discovered even before the function is added into the repository and on to the clients and testers. As a type of TDD or Test Driven Development, developers constantly check for the bugs during the process of making the whole system. Even with the isolation of one fragment from another during the tests, the overall continuous database integrity is not compromised.
This prevents the faulty products to reach testers and clients since the programming team is alerted of them automatically. This makes the whole process to be less costly than passing something that might still have fatal bugs to consumers. And with checking only parts it make changing these fragments work without affecting the original behavior of the existing code as a whole.
The program is protected from time and space bound factors. When the tests are done, the code is guaranteed to work under all circumstances even after updates done later. Like mentioned earlier, the whole system is protected from the domino effect of bugs and errors when an edit is done or when a feature is added. This makes sure that while the testing is compartmentalized, its connection to other modules remain.
In software development, the more code is added to the repository, the more difficult it is to find the faulty piece of programming if something crashes. This is not the case with unit testing. This results to other developers being reluctant to add in the program already written in fear that if they added to the repository it might destroy everything.
There are cases when clients ask for quick fixes. With the fear of adding more modules, or removing them from the whole, it becomes easier for developers to deploy the fixes. There are no side effects that can cause the program to crash because the results are already tested without the need of predicting the logical errors that may occur.
There will always be a counter argument to disqualify this method. The strongest one being that this type of TDD is just too time consuming. But the point of this method is for future development and in circumstances that other modules might be added. The nature of unit testing also makes it readable for developers who might get deployed to the project in later stages.
About the Author:
For IBM i series unit testing, look no further than our recommended website. To obtain an online quote, visit this homepage by clicking on http://tachyonstiglobal.com ASAP.